Short Skirts and Inappropriate Gender Messages in Tide Commercial

Have you seen this Tide commercial?

As you watch it, write down the first five words that come to mind or your initial reactions.

This is my response to it: There are quite a few things going on here that are disturbing in terms of the dynamics in family structure and the sexualization of young girls.

The Father: He is a typical American male — a worker, a father, a producer. After working on the fence, he chooses his daughter’s white mini skirt to wipe the grime and oil off his hands and then tosses it in the hamper. He chooses the skirt out of all the other items hanging on the clothesline (who uses clotheslines nowadays?), to show his repulsion towards the overt sexualization of his daughter via her fashion. No man wants his daughter to walk around in short skirts and be ogled by young men with raging hormones. But why not toss it in the garbage? Why the hamper? This shows his powerlessness. He can ruin the skirt, temporarily, but he has no voice in the family. The girl removes it from the hamper, the mom saves the day by using Tide to clean it, and the dad is pet on the head as if he is a naughty puppy. He has no power. He attempts to  rid his daughter’s life of something that will transform his little girl into a woman, but in the end, he is overcome by the women in his life.

The Daughter: The daughter has learned that “Dad is trying to ruin (her) style,” not that he is trying to protect her from boys and men that like to look at young girls in short skirts and try to make them “mine” as the rap song in the background recounts. A stereotyped teen, fashion is everything and wearing mini skirts is fashionable. She has to be pretty and thin and in fashion to be popular and to be liked. And it’s great that boys can look at her and want to claim her as theirs. That is her role. This is what she learns about her identity, and this is the lesson taught to the young girls that watch this advertisement. Sexual identity IS their identity. She also learns that her mother will support her sexy identity; after all, she is a woman and she understands the pressures that come with looking pretty and sexy. Unlike daddy, that crazy guy sitting on the couch and reading his paper. Aw, he’s so cute trying to ruin her style — trying to protect her from exploitation and her identity as a sex kitten.

The Mother: The mother here is the ring leader. She is the culprit, the one person who should NOT be buying, let alone cleaning a short skirt for her daughter to wear out. The fact that the song in the background is telling us why the girl is wearing the short skirt and how she will be received once she’s out of her house only makes her a more ridiculous mother because she is OK with it. I know this is just a commercial, but there are subversive messages that are being sent to our kids, and when we chuckle at ads like this, we undermine the serious nature of how we send our girls out in the world. And more importantly, how we don’t prepare them for real life problems that arise because of their heightened sexual identity. When I see tweens in short spandex shorts and bikinis walking around the neighborhood or riding their bikes, I wonder how their parents were able to purchase these items for them. We teach our girls in owning their sexuality, but we don’t teach them about owning their bodies and their intelligence. We don’t teach them how to protect themselves against vile men and sadists and rapists.

And so when this mother smiles as her daughter twirls in a mini skirt, rubs her father’s head, and walks out the door with the lyrics of  Studio B’s “I See Girls” on the soundtrack, there is an emphasis on the fact that it is OK for men to watch and objectify girls; with moms who allow their girls to objectify themselves; with dads who don’t try hard enough, or who are silent in the obvious objectification of their daughters and other girls; with advertising that thinks it’s OK to use overt female sexuality to sell products as innocuous and domestic as laundry detergent; and with music videos that have no problems reducing women to tits and ass — to sexual vixens whose power stems only from their attractiveness to the male gaze and appetite. What is really mind-boggling is the fact that this commercial, while objectifying young girls, is aimed at women consumers. And we don’t revolt. There is no outcry. We are made to feel powerful, with a louder voice in the home; we wear the pants, the commercial tell us. But with all this power over our husbands, we are smiling as we send our daughters out into the world as eye candy. We are getting a pat on the back for helping them exploit our girls. Nice job, Moms! Better luck next time, dads! Next time, throw the skirt in the trash.

Here’s the Studio B music video to the song used on this commercial, which is sickening from a woman and a mother’s perspective. That the two — a sexist song with video to match and a Tide commercial — are used to highlight the domestic duties of women (laundry, motherhood, marriage, the home, and raising sexy daughters) — is quite offensive and repugnant.

 Short Skirts and Inappropriate Gender Messages in Tide Commercial
dp seal trans 16x16 Short Skirts and Inappropriate Gender Messages in Tide Commercial Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 Marina DelVecchio
pixel Short Skirts and Inappropriate Gender Messages in Tide Commercial
Did you like this? Share it:

About Marina DelVecchio

Marina is a writer who focuses her work on the need for female empowerment. She writes articles, books, and blogs centered on female experiences related to motherhood, female agency, feminism, and building positive images for young girls and women. She currently teaches English Composition, Research, and Literary Analysis as an Adjunct on the College level.

12 Responses to Short Skirts and Inappropriate Gender Messages in Tide Commercial

  1. Lori says:

    That ad has always bothered me. Thank you Marina, for putting into words what I could not.

  2. Leslie Cooper says:

    How disappointing. I have not yet seen this commercial, but now that I have, I will be sure to let Tide know how I feel. It really disgusts me not only as a woman, but as a mother of a young girl.

  3. What a horrendous commercial. I’m loving your awesome, passionate deconstruction. This completely renders the dad powerless, and the mother completely complicit in the sexualization of her own daughter. Men and women can both be disgusted and offended by this one. Who the heck approves these things? Does this actually sell detergent?

  4. someguy says:

    I’m a 27 year old guy, and thought it was pretty screwed up. Especially if you listen to the lyrics of the song, wtf?? This is obviously geared toward spoiled teens/desparate housewifes, where like you said the dad is absolutely useless. If I had a daughter that skirt would have been made it into the garbage. Anyways, it’s just a sign of the times I guess…

    • I don’t get too many men commenting on this site, and the fact that you are young also, and find this commercial ridiculously offensive is a good sign. Thank you for taking the time to comment and for visiting. I appreciate it.

  5. blackmarina says:

    Seeing things like this makes me cringe. I’m a fifteen year old girl in high school, specifically a high school that has no dress code. Because of this, I regularly see girls wearing shorts that could only be described as denim underwear, stiletto heels, sheer shirts and all kinds of things like that. My father, when seeing me in something like that, tells me how he feels and leaves it up to me to make the right decision. I immediately take whatever it is off, because if teenage boys are looking at me in a lewd manner, there’s no telling what a vulgar adult might be thinking, and I think other girls my age should be made to see the danger they’re putting themselves in.

    • The fact that a high school girls finds something wrong with this commercial is wonderfully eye-opening for me. Since my kids are young, and they don’t watch these things, I often wonder how teen girls are affected by them — it’s great to know that you are media literate and can see past the commercial. It sounds strange to say, but I am glad that you feel uncomfortable by it — if we didn’t, then there would be a problem. Thanks for coming on and commenting!

  6. Luxbot says:

    My main problem with your (very well-written) commercial breakdown is the idea that women, not men, are responsible for what other men think or feel about what women wear. This is simply unfair. It is not up to the father to decide what his daughter wears — this smacks of the same sentiment that governs those creepy Purity Balls. Obviously, a daughter who is under 18 is subject to her parents’ rule, but it is absolutely NOT her fault if a man, say, gropes her. I object to that very strongly.

    Both parents should participate in what they feel is appropriate for their daughter.

  7. Pingback: Erin McNeill

Leave a Reply